Webalizer vs awstats

apologise, but, opinion, there other way the..

Webalizer vs awstats

Anyone have an opinion on whether AWStats is better than Webalizer or whether it is good to have both because each give a different but useful view? I always thought Webalizer a bit lame. They both have their strengths and weaknesses, and neither is perfect. I will point out that we've just added Piwik into the next version--it ties into the Analytics module to insert the JavaScript bug automatically.

It's a pretty nice tool with a lot of cool features, and a really nice looking UI. We use Google Analytics for our sites also available in the Analytics plugin, obviouslyand it works quite well for most things--I don't know that we'll stick with it forever, as it does have some negatives one of them being that we no longer have exclusive ownership of the data, which is probably not a huge issue, but it's still a moderate concern. I think we have Webalizer and AWStats configured and processing, as well, but I haven't looked at them in a couple of years I get more useful data in an easier to read format from Google Analytics.

Piwik seeks to be an Open Source replacement for Google Analytics, and it's well on its way to being a pretty good option. It isn't free, but it's got some nice features.

webalizer vs awstats

I think the Analytics module will handle it as well but I might be wrong about that one. I haven't seen a WUsage installation in years. I'd completely forgotten it existed, though Boutell used to be a pretty well-known provider of web-related tools back in the days when there were only a few dozen people who knew what a web-based application was.

webalizer vs Awstats

Check out the forum guidelines! Perl version 5. No need to use Just chmod to which makes it writable by the group thus giving apache access to it and it will work. I'm gonna have to talk with those guys. That's insane. I grepped the piwik files, and did find this notice. I'm not sure under what circumstances it appears. But once I have a minute to figure it out, I'll file a ticket in their tracker. And, of course, setting or anything greater than simply won't run at all under suexec.

It was easy to setup just following the docs. Skip to main content. These forums are locked and archived, but all topics have been migrated to the new forum. Home Forums Support Help! AWStats vs Webalizer or Both.My hosting company is running two different web stats programs on the log files for this site — Webalizer and Awstats. In the Webalizer stats I am wildly popular:. Ok, maybe not wildly popular but when you compare the figures with the Awstats results, you can see I am far less popular according to Awstats:.

For instance, look at the number of Visits for the month of July the most recent month for which we have all the data. According to Webalizer this site hadvisits in July whereas Awstats only has 30,! Look at the number of pages served in July.

Webalizer has this site servingwhereas Awstats has it only servingHow can such enormous differences be accounted for? Which one do I believe? I honestly have no idea! There really should be a standard algorithm to do that…. Is one of those apps the de-facto standard for traffic comparisons? Surely advertisers would require a particular visit-computation algorithm as a key feature?

webalizer vs awstats

As for the visits, that could be simple. Thanks for the suggestion Lar. I had Analytics on the site before but I could never make head or tail of half their graphs! On the advertising front, the only advertiser is Google and their ad service is based on the number of times their ad is clicked on.

Because they are hosting the ad, they know how often it is clicked. That may account for the differing Visits Donncha but not the Page Views which are also poles apart. I have a copy of Analog — I might try downloading the raw logs and running them through Analog for yet another view on the stats!

I would trust AW Stats to deliver a picture of the real people visiting because the gigabyte transfer documented by AW Stats is more closely related to the page weights transferred when whole pages load. I shift transfer around 7GB each month to serve around 38, monthly visitors.

I use a combination of Six Apart and Statcounter monitoring to keep the two tracking methods honest. For January offor example, my blog did Webtrends does a pretty good job on differentiating between hits and visits. The results SEEM pretty straightforward. However they charge you based on traffic, and once I crossed the first threshold and needed to pay EUR for the upgrade plus 80 EUR for the mandatory maintenance it seems I reach more and more traffic faster and faster.

Honi soit qui mal y pense…. However, you seem to have missed a paradigm shift. Hits — especially pagehits and not visits — are 20th century stuff to impress suits to get a larger budget.

Have a look at Clicktracks — they even have a free software nowadays. They not only help you to streamline your page, but also do a great job in identifying vistor trends. You might even want to look at Visitorville. Rather expensive too last time I looked at itbut it adds a fun element and does a pretty good job at showing patterns too. I would be reluctant with Google Analytics. Call me paranoid but Google does already know enough about me and my sites.

I agree about trust and Google Analytics. Something about Google Analytics feels like yet another piece of my data belonging to a Google data silo.Post a Comment. One of many things that you'll have to do once you make your web site is to keep close track of the actual statistical info available about it.

The key reason for that is the fact that you will learn the number of visitors you have in your web site and find out other very helpful info, which on the other hand will help you to observe how to enhance its efficiency. The primary options which you can use for viewing your record details about your site are Webalizer and Awstats. Each application have rapidly ever increasing popularity, which means you will have absolutely no problems discovering and taking advantage of every one of these options.

However, which one precisely is the best available in the web. To find the answer of this question, I must explain a few of the fundamental options that come with these applications and then leave the option up to you. Awstats is really a program, that is created using Perl. The benefit of that plan is the fact that it won't just evaluate internet logs, but additionally FTP and mail types, which will provide you with a lot more detailed information concerning the activity happening in your web site.

That plan could be run directly from the CGI piece of software or even in the command line. You will discover the settings file is actually simple to use, to help you alter the actual configurations of this software program item truly effortlessly.

Generally, you'll have to alter two primary issues -- where the record files and also the Awstats web icons can be found. To conclude, I must state the Awstats is actually simple for setting up and working with. Moreover, it is possible to export all of the information in XML structure, which means you will have absolutely no problems looking at this afterwards when it's needed.

The Webalizer however is actually created utilizing C, but it's restricted to examining information just from the server's internet logs. Additionally, that plan has the capacity to tract granular information, which is included in Awstats.

When you're using the default set up configurations, the Webalizer will set up straight underneath the root listing of the Apache host and also the settings file is located there. This way it is possible to operate that plan directly from the order prompt, however make sure that you will modify the actual settings file correctly prior to running it. By using their program, you'll effortlessly observe how much traffic you had in your web site for the past yr and you'll visit a large amount of diagrams displaying that info.

Exam 3 organic chemistry

The structure is actually simple for reading and comprehending, so it's extremely ideal for site owners, who do not have access to a lot of abilities and understanding of internet based applications. To conclude, I must state the Awstats is easier for implementing and also exhibits much more versatility compared to Webalizer.

Nevertheless, each application will help you to begin to see the info in a really obvious and simple for understanding method. No comments:.

Newer Post Older Post Home. Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom.There are two main technological approaches to collecting web analytics data.

Samreen ali challenges video

The first method is log file analysis used by AwStats or Webalizer. These programs read the log files written by the web servers to analyse patterns of behaviour found in the log files and produce reports and graphs to assist you.

The second method, uses JavaScript on each page to notify a third-party server in the case of Google Analytics when a page has been rendered by a web browser. The major differences between the two solutions is due to two main factors.

Log File Analysis If a returning visitor has file caching enabled on their web browser and usually that is the case, the request for the file they have already viewed may not be sent by the browser to the web server, instead they will view a local copy, therefor AwStats or Webalizer will not detect multiple visits by some users.

Also lets say there are four computers all on an internal network if they all visit your site they will all be seen as visits from the same ip address and therefore the same user by AwStats or Webalizer. Javascript on Each Page Relies on the clients visitors browser voluntarily providing the analytical information requested.

However some browsers disable some data collection for a variety of reasons including security. Also some browsers have Javascript disabled all together.

Mcq questions for class 7 history chapter 2

However each computer that has Javascript enabled is seen as a unique visitor despite the fact that there could be multiple users on one computer. This method also relies on each and every page that you want to collect analytical information for having the javascript code with the Google Analytics key embedded in it in the correct place on your page. We know how many of those there are out there with their countless configuration, version, platform and addon possibilities.

For the others the data is collected in one single place, your web server. If you host your site in a different time zone to the one you live in.

These differences are partly responsible for the variations in the Analytics produced by the technologies.

AWStats vs Webalizer or Both

Which makes Allan extremely well equipped to understand your needs for any application or web site. Contact Allan to develop an application or web site for your business or for you personally. You must be logged in to post a comment.

Mallincam outreach kit

Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment.These are two very different approaches to traffic analysis, but their goal is the same -- to help you gain information on the behavior of your potential customers, so that you can customize your site for increased sales.

As a server-side analysis package, Webalizer has some important advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, it captures traffic that client-side analytics programs may not, such as users whose computers have JavaScript turned off. On the other hand, it often over-estimates data. Lacking cookies to recognize visitors, it sets a minute cutoff after which a new page view is considered a separate visit. This means that if a user loads your site but doesn't click another link for 31 minutes, Webalizer logs that single visit twice.

It also lumps traffic from search engine spiders in with human traffic, further inflating the numbers. Like Webalizer, AWStats produces its data using raw server logs, and as a result it is subject to the same pros and cons. The cutoff point for new visits is 60 minutes, however, so AWStats gives slightly lower traffic estimates than Webalizer.

However, it is superior over Webalizer in the amount of data it displays and the presentation of that data. In addition to visits, page views, hits and bandwidth, AWStats also displays metrics such as referring sites and which search engines are sending you traffic.

Google Analytics is the most popular traffic analysis package.

1feexv6bahb8ybzjqqmjjrccrhgw9sb6uf key

It has a huge suite of visualization options and data manipulation tools, including goal and event tracking, visitor path tracking and more control over the date ranges under display, to name but a few. However, it does have downsides: it tends to underestimate traffic slightly, cannot track visitors who use computers with JavaScript turned off, and has a learning curve before you can get the most out of it.

If you host your own website, you likely already have both AWStats and Webalizer, or at least an equivalent server-side package.

Instalando y configurando WEBALIZER y AWSTATS en Debian 8

They are better than nothing, but to truly optimize your online operations, you need the power that a program like Analytics provides. AWStats and Webalizer can give you rough data on how much traffic you get and which pages are the most popular, while Google Analytics pulls all this together into a single story, helping you see how the traffic flows within your site, as well as how pages are doing individually.

Warren Davies has been writing sincefocusing on bespoke projects for online clients such as PsyT and The Institute of Coaching. This has been alongside work in research, web design and blogging. A Linux user and gamer, warren trains in martial arts as a hobby.

He has a Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in psychology, and further qualifications in statistics and business studies. Google Analytics: Page Views Vs. Unique Views. Share on Facebook. Webalizer As a server-side analysis package, Webalizer has some important advantages and disadvantages. Google Analytics Google Analytics is the most popular traffic analysis package. Considerations If you host your own website, you likely already have both AWStats and Webalizer, or at least an equivalent server-side package.

Photo Credits. About the Author.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

Webmasters Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for pro webmasters. It only takes a minute to sign up. I realize that comparing Awstats and Webalizer to Google Analytics is like comparing apples to oranges, but each of them track at least basic statistics about visitors and pages. For example, comparing Analytics with Awstats using some numbers from a small site over the past week:.

They're similar on the number of visits, but page views and uniques are quite different. I'm familiar with discrepancies of a much higher magnitude on some larger sites, showing that this trend scales proportionally upward. What is the reason behind the different numbers, even when the data is quite trivial like unique visitors and page loads?

Webalizer vs. AWStats?

Google Analytics requires a Javascript callback to Google's domain and will not record traffic from users with Javascript disabled or the majority of bots. AWStats is literally reading your webserver's logs and will record in one fashion or another the bots it is programmed to recognize, visitors, and where your discrepancy likely lies it will also report bots it does not recognize as visitors. See What are some advantages of using Analytics like Urchin?

Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Why are Awstats, Webalizer, and Google Analytics results so different? Ask Question. Asked 7 years, 10 months ago.

webalizer vs awstats

Active 7 years, 10 months ago. Viewed 2k times. So why are there often very significant differences in their data? For example, comparing Analytics with Awstats using some numbers from a small site over the past week: Awstats 78 unique visitors visits 2. Matt Matt 1 1 gold badge 4 4 silver badges 16 16 bronze badges. Active Oldest Votes. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.

The Overflow Blog. Featured on Meta. Community and Moderator guidelines for escalating issues via new response…. Feedback on Q2 Community Roadmap. Linked Company Giving Back Brand Guide. Store Login. Forums New posts Trending Search forums. What's new New posts New resources Latest activity. Resources Latest reviews Search resources. Feature Requests. Log in. Search Everywhere Threads This forum This thread.

Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Everywhere Threads This forum This thread.

Led swf effects free download

Search Advanced…. New posts. Search forums. Webalizer vs. Thread starter jq99 Start date May 8, JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. May 8, 2 0 I did a search for this topic so that it didn't get talked about yet again I'm kind of new to this whole thing Dec 28, 1 The terminology between Webalizer and AWstats for pages, files and visits is pretty much the same.

However, they use different algorithms to parse out the apache access logs for your site. Those are some pretty big discrepancies.


thoughts on “Webalizer vs awstats

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top